The last of the
six new productions of the Met’s 2014-15 season, Cavalleria rusticana and Pagliacci, opened on April 14, 2015. In general, critical response to these
recent investitures has weighed heavily on the side of disappointment. Not one
of the lately unveiled stagings can be said to have enjoyed the enthusiastic
consensus of reviewers. Briefly then: The reception of The Death of Klinghoffer was mostly positive, that of Le Nozze
di Figaro, cool at best. The notices of Iolanta/Bluebeard’s
Castle were mixed; those of The Merry
Widow and La Donna del lago,
negative; and those of Cavalleria and
Pagliacci, primarily so. And only
Mozart’s treasured comedy and the Mascagni/Leocavallo hugely popular double
bill were reinvestitures of core repertoire favorites that often find themselves
subjected to particular scrutiny, especially when they propose significant
rereadings of the work.
In our previous
post, we tracked the controversy over departures from conventional settings of
the core all the way back to the 1951 Pagliacci.
We argued that the heated operatic debate of the present day had its origins in
the reception of a last-minute addition to Rudolf Bing’s inaugural season.
Not surprisingly,
given that the April productions are new, staging was front and center in the
reviews of Cav/Pag. And since the
productions they replaced were signed by Franco Zeffirelli, the comparison with
the Zeffirelli aesthetic, beloved by many of the public and detested by almost
all critics, would inevitably come to the fore. “In the beginning, say 1970,
there was Franco Zeffirelli. He turned Cavalleria
rusticana and Pagliacci, the
eternal verist twins, into a pair of kitsch spectaculars. Audiences applauded
the scenery” (Financial Times, April
15, 2015).
Zeffirelli’s
long association with the Met began with his ecstatically received 1964 Falstaff and ended with his much
derided 1998 La Traviata. Between
the two, there were ten others, including his 1970 Cav/Pag. Managements have been wary of angering Met patrons by shelving his sets with
nonchalance. Only La Bohème and Turandot survive. As Peter Gelb put it
some years ago: “I promised the Met subscribers when I first
came on board—well, I didn’t promise anything, but I did say that there were
two iconic Zeffirelli productions, Bohème and Turandot,
and that the other Zeffirelli productions are going to be replaced. A lot of
these things are just sitting there like lead weights, so there is a lot of
catching up to do” (New Yorker (Oct. 22, 2007). He has been good to his word. The
Zeffirelli Falstaff, Tosca, Traviata, and Carmen
are history.
|
And now so too
are Cavalleria and Pagliacci. Zeffirelli deployed much of
the action of Cavalleria on a
monumental church stairway that filled half the stage; realistic housefronts
with balconies and views of the hill town framed this meticulous slice-of-life
rendering of a bright, colorful Easter Sunday in Sicily.
Eschewing the slightest hint of the picturesque that floods the
Zeffirelli version, even in the religious procession, the David McVicar/Rae
Smith production drains the stage of the specificity of the quotidian, of color
and light.
Displacement here is not of place or date--the action transpires as is
prescribed in a Sicilian village circa 1880--but of time. The artistic team
turns day into night (some have observed that the darkness signals not mass on Easter
morn, but midnight mass). A revolving platform repositions again and again a
patriarchal community of subjugated women and swaggering, predatory men, the
better to give relief to the drama of
individual betrayal. Santuzza, victim and ultimately avenger, is repeatedly set
apart from the black-clad villagers whose codes she has broken.
Many of those
glad to bid farewell to Zeffirelli’s obsessive pictorialism, including
reviewers who missed few opportunities to put him down, were disappointed by
its replacement, spare or not. The Times was
irritated by the over-active platform, the New
Yorker found the staging “relentlessly grim,” the Observer thought that it “bombed on just about every level.” Only
the Wall Street Journal gave a thumbs
up. With caveats about the lighting and the male dancers who mimed Alfio’s
horses, we thought the show compelling in its abstraction, particularly as it
transformed the lengthy genre scenes of village life into comments on the
opera’s social/sexual politics.
For Pagliacci, McVicar and Smith moved the
action forward from 1865 to 1950 and
from Calabria to Sicily. We are alerted that the two operas take place in the
same southern Italian town square by the imposing stone walls that enclose both
narratives. There, the unity ends.
As it happened,
the square, neon lights, and stalled truck of the McVicar/Smith Pagliacci turned out to be more naturalistic
than Zeffirelli’s rocky outcroppings, stunted tree, and big sky.
Pagliacci, Metropolitan Opera, 2015; Patricia Racette, George Gagnidze
The new version
added a three-man vaudeville team. The intervention of the trio into the
prologue (one of several inventions) violated the expository, deeply human and
complex import of the baritone’s aria. While the press, in general, was amused
by the antics, for us the slapstick of the play-within-a-play went too far in
making the critical contrast between farce and melodrama. For this post, we
have chosen two clips that demonstrate the power of music and text when the
performer rather than the production is the primary site of meaning.
Lawrence Tibbett
sings “Si può?” (If I may)” in this scene from Metropolitan (1935), the fifth of six feature films he made between
1930 and 1937. Tibbett, who had a successful career in Hollywood simultaneously
with his Met stardom, is captured here at his extraordinary prime, reaching out
to the audience with gestures as subtly inflected as his phrasing and the
colors of his voice. The charisma of the singer and the purpose of the
character are perfectly joined.
Giovanni
Martinelli sings “Vesti la giubba” in this 1926 Vitaphone short. The aria is
forever associated with Enrico Caruso, the tenor who holds the Met record for
performances of Pagliacci. Martinelli
became the company’s Canio after Caruso’s premature death. As you will hear, he
favors an unusually slow tempo. Sustaining astonishing tension with astonishing
vocal energy, the tenor gives the tragic density of the short piece its full
due.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Please enter your comment here: