The first set of posts in
this series was devoted to Tiana Lemnitz, Germaine Lubin, and Ebe Stignani who,
although contracted by the Met in the years before the United States entered World
War II, would not or could not come. That opportunity lost, there would not be
another, and the Met stage would never see three of the thrilling singers of
the time. For differing reasons, and not
surprisingly, many other artists would be absent during the years of conflict. There were the decrees of the Italian and
German dictatorships, of course, and the endless contingencies of war. There were personal considerations as well, the
most famous of which was Kirsten Flagstad’s decision to return to Norway in
1941 so as to be by her husband’s side
during the occupation of her homeland--thereby depriving the Met of its star soprano. The Swedish Wagnerian tenor Set Svanholm’s
debut, scheduled for that year, was delayed until 1946; he was unable to book a
clipper reservation and refused to make the dangerous ocean voyage. And there
was Ettore Panizza who, uninterruptedly since 1934, had been principal
conductor of the Met’s Italian repertoire. In June 1942, he canceled his
1942-43 appearances for fear of wartime travel.
All this left Edward
Johnson, the Met general manager from 1935 to 1950, in the precarious position
of having to cast productions without the European singers on whom the Metropolitan
had relied since its inception in 1883. The Americanization of the company that
had, from the beginning, been axiomatic to the Canadian-born Johnson’s regime as
a matter of principle, by 1939 had become a matter of necessity. In May 1942,
he told the Metropolitan board, “The day is gone for an operatic manager to have any such surprise as the withdrawal of
so many performers who had been contracted in store. His function is undergoing an inevitable
transition from the purveyance of established foreign success to the discovery
and development of native talent.” The
company’s future would depend on a gifted and well-trained cadre of national
singers. Two years later, with
“reconversion … in the air,” Johnson wrote that the curtain would rise
on “what is predominantly an American opera company.” That fall, “nearly
two-thirds of the singing personnel [had] been actually born in this
country.” America would soon move from
“importer of talent” to “producer of talent” and ultimately to “exporter of
talent” (Times, Nov. 26, 1944). Johnson had gotten ahead of himself. In
the Met of the 1940s, new American
stars, however lustrous, were insufficiently numerous to compensate for the
European absentees. Among those pressed
into service were Regina Resnik, the subject of the next post, and Astrid
Varnay.
Born in Sweden to Hungarian
opera singers, Varnay was brought to New York as a small child. She made her
Met debut at age twenty-three on December 6, 1941, the day before the Japanese
attack on Pearl Harbor. Varnay, who had been trained in New York, had never before
appeared as a professional on any stage. Stepping in for the indisposed Lotte
Lehmann, in Lehmann’s signature role, Sieglinde, the young soprano was cast
opposite none other than the world’s premier heldentenor, Lauritz Melchior.
Fortuitously for us, and accessible on Youtube, this event fell on a Saturday
matinee. The transcription of the broadcast documents the performance not of an
inexperienced tyro but of a compelling interpreter of the role. The Times reviewer noted a voice of “innate
beauty” and warned the company against impairing its quality by casting Varnay
in such heavy parts. But, absent the Met’s leading Wagnerians Australian
Marjorie Lawrence (felled by polio) and Flagstad, Varnay was immediately called
upon to share roles with the American Helen Traubel.
There is no doubt that early
years of hard use took the bloom off Varnay’s voice; in compensation, she
developed a sumptuous instrument, capable of surmounting the most brazen
orchestral surges, and a personality made to the heroic measure of Brünnhilde,
Isolde, and Elektra. Those who predicted that her career would be curtailed by
the overparting to which she was subjected in her early twenties were proved wrong.
She sang leading dramatic soprano roles for three decades, first at the
Metropolitan, then in Europe’s major houses, before taking on the mezzo
repertoire for another twenty-five years.
Here is Varnay in a 1949 New
York Philharmonic broadcast from Carnegie Hall. Tireless in meeting the
daunting demands of Strauss, with mounting excitement and deep reserves of
tone, she traces the arc of Elektra’s nine-minute-long opening
monologue: her despair and loneliness, the grizzly recital of the death of her
father, Agamemnon, murdered in his bath by his wife and her lover, the bloody
revenge Elektra and her brother will wreak on the assassins, the sacrifice of
horses and hounds, the siblings’ triumphal dance. When Varnay sang the role at
the Met in 1952, she was hailed for her “musical accuracy, total propulsion,
and continuing freshness of sound so rare in this part as to be almost unheard
of.”
Varnay’s career as a Met
soprano ended in 1956. (She returned as a principal mezzo between 1974 and
1979.) During her soprano period, Wagner accounted for most of her activity,
followed by Strauss. She did, however, sing a few performances of Cavalleria rusticana and Simon Boccanegra; the latter, in spring 1950, was an
important and well received revival of Verdi’s opera. Varnay and
Leonard Warren, another star member of the Met’s Americanization project, made
a commercial recording of the Amelia-Boccanegra recognition scene. A lyric
sorpano’s float above the staff is not encompassed by Varnay’s dark instrument anchored in the middle register. Nonetheless, her Amelia comes alive
through incisive phrasing and scrupulous musicianship and validates her
partnership with Warren, the compleat Verdi baritone.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Please enter your comment here: